I would say that the biggest problem with using this as an analogy is when one moves from the analogy and starts discussing what these works are in the main topic of a Christian relationship with the Lord and , more importantly , what prompts the Christian to do them .
Logging truck analogy If I was to say that on my way here, I stood on the road was hit by a logging truck doing 100 miles an hour, you would say, “That’s absolutely absurd.
I used the Baptist and Methodist analogy as to include and contrast both sides of the question. I know there are many nuances to various beliefs on the subject and it's one of the main points of contention between the Missionary Baptists and the Freewill Baptists.
There Paul even points out the common can become the honored vessel. Just because Paul uses a Potter as being God in his analogy and Jerimiah 18 uses a Potter as being God in his analogy, does not mean the analogies are conveying the exact same analogy.
The Big Bang is not a star forming or exploding into empty space. It is an expansion of space itself from an extremely hot, dense state. There was no “empty space” surrounding it. The analogy to a collapsing sun or to electrons orbiting a nucleus is physically not applicable.
This is a pretty self-explanitory post. Let me say first that when I have conversations with those who call themselves "Orthodox" (i.e., attend Church, have a few icons, maybe are confirmed, etc) do not understand Church history, arguing the same, repetitive points against the 'two-lung' analogy...