Lest we forget, Sink the Bismarck was based on the 1959 historical novel Hunting the Bismarck by C.S.Forester. Forester made no pretense about it being anything more than a novel.
Re: Bismarck at DS after the second turn by Antonio Bonomi » Wed 4:17 am
Bismarck at DS after the second turn - Page 16 - Naval History Forums
Anyway, with Dumas or without it I regard that, if Bismarck and Tirpitz were clearly superior to the USN Treaty battleships it will be next to impossible for the french vessels to be superior to thosse German ships.
Bismarck straddled Rodney at 3rd salvo, around 8:51, causing minor splinter damage, followed by an immediate course alteration performed by Rodney (slightly to the N-E), and by KGV (slightly to the S-E).
Re: Bismarck and her contemporaries by Bgile » Wed 5:50 pm There seems to always be a significant number of duds when heavy armor is encountered. However, a dud can sometimes be even more damaging than a bullet which explodes. For example, suppose a shell failed to explode and instead was deflected through the bottom of the ship?
The concern is that the same could happen with the wreck of Bismarck or any other sunken ship in the future. I am all in favour of exploring the debris field, on a look but don't touch basis, ie. without looting. But until international law is clarified on this the motives of future expeditions inevitably comes into question.
KGV displaced 37500 tons standard and Bismarck 41700 tons standard. Yes, Bismarck was heavier , but not in the proportion usualy considered. Tirpitz weighed 44200 tons standard, while Anson displaced ~ 42200 tons standard, both in 1942. Contrary to popular opinion, KGV was heavier on a per meter basis then Bismarck was.