Field & Stream: How To Catch Big Fall Pike On Surface Flies
Yahoo! Sports: "That’s how the legend began: 'Clyde can catch flies!'" – Walt Frazier reveals how he earned a "reputation" for catching flies with his bare hands
"That’s how the legend began: 'Clyde can catch flies!'" – Walt Frazier reveals how he earned a "reputation" for catching flies with his bare hands
The Economic Times on MSN: Latin proverb of the day: 'The eagle does not catch flies'—ancient wisdom for modern focus
A Latin proverb, 'Aquila non capit muscas,' teaches a timeless lesson. It means the eagle does not catch flies. This ancient wisdom advises people of importance to focus on significant goals. They ...
Latin proverb of the day: 'The eagle does not catch flies'—ancient wisdom for modern focus
Outdoor Life: Quick Strike Podcast: How to Catch Giant Trout on Tiny Flies
Sports Illustrated: The Top 6 Flies for Smallmouth Bass That Will Catch More Fish
The Top 6 Flies for Smallmouth Bass That Will Catch More Fish
Does using the 'catch, when' feature make exception handling faster because the handler is skipped as such and the stack unwinding can happen much earlier as when compared to handling the specific use cases within the handler?
Both constructs (catch () being a syntax error, as sh4nx0r rightfully pointed out) behave the same in C#. The fact that both are allowed is probably something the language inherited from C++ syntax. , can throw objects that do not derive from System.Exception. In these languages, catch will handle those non-CLS exceptions, but catch (Exception) won't.